会议讲座 Updates
Position: 首页 Home» 动态 News» 会议讲座 Updates

03.28: 风华系列讲座2025春季第二场:Fake Plastic Minds

图片

 

 

讲座信息

 

 

 

主题:

Fake Plastic Minds(塑料心智)
 

 

主讲人:

Sebastian Sunday Grève (王小塞)
北京大学哲学系 助理教授

 

 

主持人:刘哲

北京大学外国哲学研究所、北京大学哲学系 教授

 

 

讲座时间:

2025年3月28日 周五 19:00-21:00

 

 

讲座地点:北京大学新太阳学生中心210室

 

 

讲座方式:

(1)现场参与。本次讲座对高校及科研机构哲学专业的在师生开放,欢迎感兴趣的师友报名,到现场讨论交流。

(2)线上直播。请关注“北京大学哲学系”视频号收看直播。

 

主办单位:

北京大学外国哲学研究所  

北京大学哲学系

 

 

 

 

主讲人:Sebastian Sunday Grève (王小塞)

图片

Sebastian Sunday Grève (王小塞) is a German philosopher, who completed his doctorate in Oxford and is now living in Beijing, where he has worked as an assistant professor at Peking University since autumn 2019. He is a faculty member of the Institute of Foreign Philosophy at Peking University and a former fellow at the Berggruen China Center. He works broadly in philosophy, on both practical and theoretical issues. Recent research articles include ‘A Confucian Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles’ (with Tingting Sui/隋婷婷) and The Biological Objection against b AI’. Recent popular essays include ‘AI’s First Philosopher’ and ‘Nietzsche and the Machines’.

 

 

 

 

 

主持人:刘哲

图片

 
 
北京大学教授,哲学系副书记兼副主任,北京大学博古睿研究中心中方主任。曾任第24届世界哲学大会中国组委会执行秘书长,北京大学人工智能研究院副院长。主要研究领域为主体性理论、德国古典哲学、现象学与人工智能和机器人伦理。入选国家万人计划“青年拔尖人才”与文化名家暨“四个一批”人才计划,承担国家社科基金、国家机器人标准化总体组、中国工程院等科研项目。现任European Journal of PhilosophyBritish Journal for the History of PhilosophyJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology国际哲学刊物编委委员。近期出版专著《生成主体性》(2021),译著黑格尔《自然哲学》(2022),主编《中国机器人伦理标准化前瞻2019》(2019),在Idealistic StudiesPhilosophy TodayFichte-StudienChiasmi International,《中国社会科学》等专业刊物出版中英文论文近30篇。

 

 

 

 

讲座摘要

 

This paper presents an argument to the conclusion that machines can acquire human mindedness, that is, they can be intelligent, conscious, sentient, etc. in precisely the way that a human being typically is. Machines are defined here as digital computers—i.e., the same type of engineered and programmed artefact as the vast majority of our modern-day computing devices—with the additional condition that these artefacts must be primarily made from non-organic materials such as silicon or plastic. Following a brief review of the history of the type of argument advanced here, a thought experiment is presented and analysed, culminating in the aforementioned conclusion. That conclusion is then defended against a number of objections.

 

 

 

TOP